<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SHORELINE VIEW</title>
	<link>http://www.jimmylongacre.com/02/shoreline-view.html</link>
	<description>My Insatiable Obsession</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Longacre</title>
		<link>http://www.jimmylongacre.com/02/shoreline-view.html#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Longacre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jimmylongacre.com/02/shoreline-view.html#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Glad you like it, Buff.  In answer to your question concerning the difficulty of painting small as opposed to larger, the answer is in some ways, yes and no.  'Yes', because you must still supply sufficient visual interest to allow the viewers imagination to take hold.  'No', because while the basic concerns of painting remain the same, it allows me to work on every aspect of the painting in one session, from initial compositional rough-in, through color selection, shape and edge manipulations, center of interest, and finishing touches.  These small daily paintings often serve as the sketch for a larger work.  The nice thing is that like working out a musical arrangement on a piano, you have a clear idea of what you're about when you bring in the orchestra.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you like it, Buff.  In answer to your question concerning the difficulty of painting small as opposed to larger, the answer is in some ways, yes and no.  &#8216;Yes&#8217;, because you must still supply sufficient visual interest to allow the viewers imagination to take hold.  &#8216;No&#8217;, because while the basic concerns of painting remain the same, it allows me to work on every aspect of the painting in one session, from initial compositional rough-in, through color selection, shape and edge manipulations, center of interest, and finishing touches.  These small daily paintings often serve as the sketch for a larger work.  The nice thing is that like working out a musical arrangement on a piano, you have a clear idea of what you&#8217;re about when you bring in the orchestra.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buff Waters</title>
		<link>http://www.jimmylongacre.com/02/shoreline-view.html#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Buff Waters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jimmylongacre.com/02/shoreline-view.html#comment-64</guid>
		<description>I like this -- it has a nice pastoral feel.  

Question: What are the differences between painting on an 8x6 canvas vs., say, 24x18? Less time needed to complete the work, I'm sure.  Are details more difficult to do? What else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this &#8212; it has a nice pastoral feel.  </p>
<p>Question: What are the differences between painting on an 8&#215;6 canvas vs., say, 24&#215;18? Less time needed to complete the work, I&#8217;m sure.  Are details more difficult to do? What else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
